KING JOHN II OF ENGLAND AND IRELAND

KING JOHN OF SCOTLAND

TITULAR KING AS THE MALE LINE HEIR OF KING JAMES II AND VII

 

WELCOME TO THE WEBPAGE FOR

HIS SERENE HIGHNESS

JOHN ROBERT MICHAEL FRANCIS LAYTON

 

·    HIS MAJESTY JOHN (Titular) KING OF ENGLAND, SCOTLAND & IRELAND.

(the addressed title in Catholic Europe with these recognized subsidiary titles from the countries below )

·     PRINCE OF ROHAN-GUEMENEE (France)

·   DUKE OF ROHAN-ROHAN (France)

·    GRAND ROYAL CHEVALIER OF SENLIS (France)

·    PRINCE-DUKE OF VERMANDOIS (Belgium)

·    PRINCE-PROTECTOR OF THE VATICAN

·      DUKE OF WESTPHALIA (Italy)

·     MARQUIS DE ZARZUELA (Spain)

·     H.R.H. THE COUNT ROHAN (Monaco)

         

                                                                   PRINCE JOHN AT 18                                       KING JAMES AT 22!

 

 PRINCE JOHN IS THE 8TH GREAT GRANDSON OF KING JAMES II & VII OF ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND

 

ONE SIMPLY NEEDS TO TAKE NOTE OF FACIAL FEATURES TO SEE THAT  I AM DIRECTLY RELATED. NOTE THE REDDISH-BROWN HAIR SO COMMON AMONG THE STUARTS (STEWARTS), THE CLEFT CHIN AND JAW LINE. NOTICE THE SHAPE OF THE MOUTH AND ITS POSITION. THE EYES AND BROWS. MINE IS FROM HIS MY MOTHER’S SIDE, WHOM WAS ALSO A DIRECT DESCENDANT HERSELF OF THE PLANTAGENET KINGS OF ENGLAND.

 

THE STUART KINGS WERE RENOWNED FOR THEIR HEIGHT ALL BEING OVER 6’3” EVEN MARY, QUEEN OF THE SCOTS, KING JAMES II & VII’S GREAT GRANDMOTHER AND MY 11TH GREAT GRANDMOTHER, WAS 6 FEET TALL! THE LAYTON MEN ARE NO EXCEPTION, I AM 6’5”. MY FATHER WAS 6’3” MY UNCLE WAS 6’4” AND MY GRANDFATHER WAS 6’5” MY GRANDFATHER WAS ALSO AN EXACT COPY OF MY 8TH GREAT UNCLE KING CHARLES II

                                                                       

  KING CHARLES II                    PRINCE MADISON "DUB"

 

NOT A SINGLE EXPERT THAT HAS EXAMINED AND MEASURED MY FACE OR KING JAMES' CAN SAY THAT WE ARE NOT DIRECTLY RELATED! FURTHER DIRECT DESCENT HAS BEEN PROVEN USING DNA EVIDENCE THAT MATCHES MY DNA TO A SON OF KING CHARLES I, A SON WHO WAS NOT KING CHARLES II. THE DNA REPORT FURTHER STATES I AM DIRECTLY DESCENDED FROM THIS MALE SON OF CHARLES I AND A FEMALE OF THE MODENA LINE; THAT REALLY COULD ONLY BE JAMES II AND VII AND HIS 2ND WIFE MARY OF MODENA!

 

 

NOT ONE OF THE KNOWN DESCENDANTS  OF KING JAMES II AND VII AND ARABELLA CHURCHILL(HIS MISTRESS) HAVE PUBLISHED AND OR DOCUMENTED DNA REPORTS. THESE KNOWN DESCENDANTS ARE THE EARLS WALDEGRAVE AND THE EARLS SPENCER, WHICH INCLUDES PRINCE WILLIAM OF CAMBRIDGE FROM HIS MOTHER PRINCESS DIANA OF WALES. ONE OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED EARLS HAD TOLD ME THEY ARE FORBIDDEN FROM HAVING OR GIVING THEIR DNA INFORMATION MADE PUBLIC UNDER PENALTY OF ATTAINMENT(MEANS THEIR LANDS AND TITLES WILL BE TAKEN BY THE MONARCH). IT DOES MAKE ME WONDER WHAT THE BRITISH HAVE TO HIDE.

 

 

FAMILY HISTORY: KING JAMES II & VII OF ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND WAS THE 2ND ELDEST SON OF KING CHARLES I;  CHARLES I ,WAS BEHEADED BY  HIS OWN PARLIAMENT AND THE FAMILY WAS SENT INTO EXILE IN FRANCE. AFTER CROMWELL DIED, CHARLES I'S DEATH WAS RULED AS MURDER AND KING CHARLES II  RETURNED TO ONCE AGAIN RULE ENGLAND. AFTER KING CHARLES II DIED WITHOUT LEGITIMATE HEIRS, JAMES ASCENDED THE THRONE LEGALLY AND CORRECTLY AS KING JAMES II & VII. IN 1664 UNDER THE COMMAND OF THE THEN JAMES, DUKE OF YORK & DUKE OF ALBANY, LORD HIGH ADMIRAL, CAPTURED THE PROVINCE OF NEW NETHERLANDS FROM THE DUTCH AND RENAMED IT THE PROVINCE OF NEW YORK IN HONOR OF JAMES' TITLE AS THE DUKE OF YORK AND NAMED ITS CAPITAL ALBANY FOR JAMES' SCOTTISH TITLE AS WELL.

 

KING CHARLES I WAS THE ONLY SON OF KING JAMES I & VI TO LIVE TO ADULTHOOD. CHARLES I AND HIS WIFE HAD 7 CHILDREN BUT ONLY 2 MADE IT TO ADULTHOOD, KING CHARLES I AND HIS SISTER PRINCE ELIZABETH WHERE THE ONLY 2 OF 7 CHILDREN TO LIVE TO BECOME ADULTS. PRINCESS ELIZABETH WAS MARRIED OFF TO THE KING OF BOHEMIA, THAT SAME PRINCESS ELIZABETH IS THE PROGENITOR THE CURRENT LINE AND THAT IS WHY "THE CURRENT QUEEN" ELIZABETH IS ON THE THRONE AND NOT A STUART AS IT SHOULD BE!

 

IF YOU KNOW YOUR HISTORY IT WAS KING HENRY VIII THAT ENDED THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IN ENGLAND, BUT WHEN HIS DAUGHTER, QUEEN ELIZABETH I, DIED HAVING NEVER MARRIED NOR HEIRS OF HER OWN, THE CLOSEST RELATIVE WAS KING JAMES VI SCOTLAND AS A DOUBLE GREAT, GREAT GRANDSON OF KING HENRY VII, BOTH KING JAMES VI’S FATHER AND MOTHER WERE GRANDCHILDREN OF PRINCE MARGARET TUDOR, ELDEST CHILD AND DAUGHTER OF KING HENRY VII, SHE WAS THE OLDER SISTER OF KING HENRY VIII. SO WITH ALL OF KING HENRY VIII’S  AND HIS DAUGHTER ELIZABETH I'S ATTEMPTS TO RID ENGLAND OF CATHOLICS, THEY RETURNED TO RULE A UNITED ENGLAND AND SCOTLAND AS THE STUARTS.

 

ALTHOUGH THE STUARTS ATTEMPTED TO SHOW THAT THEY WERE NOT VERY CATHOLIC, IT WAS KING CHARLES I’S INSISTENCE ON THE DIVINE RIGHT OF KINGS TO RULE THE WAY THEY CHOSE, SOMETHING A CATHOLIC WOULD DO, THAT LEAD TO HIS BEING BEHEADED. AFTER KING CHARLES II WAS RETURNED TO TAKE THE THRONE, IT WAS HIS BROTHER, KING JAMES II THAT TOOK FOR A SECOND WIFE A CATHOLIC AND PRODUCED HIS FIRST SON JAMES FRANCIS, THE PRINCE OF WALES. KING JAMES II HAD 2 DAUGHTERS FROM AN EARLIER MARRIAGE AND THEY WERE RAISED IN THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND NOT AS CATHOLICS SINCE THEY WERE 1ST & 2ND IN LINE TO THE THRONE.

  

BUT WHEN THE CATHOLIC PRINCE OF WALES WAS BORN, PARLIAMENT HAD ISSUES. KING JAMES II AND VII WAS 52 WHEN HE ASCENDED THE THRONE AND WOULD MOSTLY LIKELY DIE IN HIS SIXTIES LEAVING A PRINCE OF WALES THAT WOULD STILL BE IN HIS MINORITY AND THEREFORE HIS CATHOLIC MOTHER WOULD MOST LIKELY RULE AS REGENT UNTIL HER SON BECAME OF AGE.

RATHER THAN FIGHT OVER CATHOLIC OR CHURCH OF ENGLAND, KING JAMES II INTRODUCED THE LAW OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, SO THAT ANY RELIGION WOULD BE FREE TO PRACTICE IN ENGLAND, NOT ONLY CATHOLICS BUT JEWS AS WELL, PRIOR TO THIS JEWS WERE NOT ALLOWED ANYWHERE IN EUROPE. THE COUNTRY THAT ALLOWED JEWISH FREEDOM FIRST WAS GERMANY WHERE THE HOLOCAUST TOOK PLACE.

 

HENCE PARLIAMENT INVITED PRINCE WILLIAM OF ORANGE, THE HUSBAND OF PRINCESS MARY, KING JAMES II’S OLDEST DAUGHTER, TO COME AND INVADE THE COUNTRY AND TAKE THE THRONE AND SHARE IT WITH HIS WIFE. PARLIAMENT NEVER RULED THAT KING JAMES ABDICATED, DESERTED THE THRONE OR THAT HE WAS LEGALLY DEPOSED, SO EVERY COUNTRY IN EUROPE AND EVEN THE CATHOLIC CHURCH CONCLUDED THAT THE THRONE HAD BEEN ILLEGALLY USURPED.

 

A GOVERNMENT IN EXILE WAS SET UP IN FRANCE AND THE STUART LINES CONTINUED, PRINCE JAMES FRANCIS MARRIED AND HAD 2 SONS, PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD AND PRINCE HENRY BENEDICT, PRINCE HENRY BECAME A CATHOLIC CARDINAL AS AN ADULT.

 

PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD’S BEST FRIEND WAS PRINCE JULES HERCULE deROHAN. PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD SEDUCED THE LOVELY YOUNG WIFE OF PRINCE JULES. WHEN IT WAS UNCOVERED THAT SHE WAS PREGNANT FROM PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD, SHE WAS SENT TO A CONVENT, WHEN THE BABY DIED PREMATURELY, PRINCE JULES HAD HER HEAD CHOPPED OFF.

 

A FEW YEARS LATER A 24 YEAR OLD PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD WAS NAMED PRINCE REGENT BY HIS FATHER, SO THAT THE YOUNGER PRINCE COULD ACT IN HIS FATHER’S NAME, PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD LANDED WITH 2 SHIPS IN SCOTLAND AND A SMALL ARMY OF MEN IN AN ATTEMPT TO CAPTURE THE THRONE AND RESTORE THE STUARTS TO THE THRONE. HIS UNCLE CARDINAL HENRY BENEDICT WAS SUPPOSED TO SEND SHIPS OF THE FRENCH FLEET TO HELP, AS THE LANDING TOOK PLACE IN DECEMBER, THE FRENCH FLEET WAS DAMAGED IN A VIOLENT WINTER STORM AND HAD TO BREAK OFF AND RETURN TO FRANCE. WHILE STILL IN SCOTLAND MANY OF THE LARGER CLANS WERE IN FAVOR OF THE STUARTS RETURNING TO THE THRONE. THIS LINE OF STUARTS HAD RULED IN SCOTLAND FOR OVER 500 YEARS BEFORE ADDING THE ENGLISH THRONE TO THEIR REALMS.

 

AFTER TAKING EDINBURGH AND DEFEATING THE ONLY BRITISH ARMY IN SCOTLAND, PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD MARCHED HIS ARMY OF 6,000 SOUTH TOWARD LONDON, ALTHOUGH MOST ENGLISH CLAIMED TO DESPISE THEIR GERMAN RULERS IN FAVOR OF THE JACOBITES (FOLLOWERS/BELIEVERS THAT KING JAMES II AND VII AND HIS HEIRS ARE THE TRUE ROYAL LINE ABOVE AND BEFORE THE HANOVERS) ONLY THE SCOTTISH JOINED THE ARMIES OF PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD, NOT ONE SINGLE ENGLISHMEN JOINED. THE REASON TO DEPOSE THE CATHOLIC KING JAMES II AND VII WAS THAT HAVING PARLIAMENT IN CONTROL OF THE GOVERNMENT ALLOWED THE ENGLISH LORDS TO CONTROL EVERYTHING INCLUDING THE MONEY!

 

THE WEAPONS OF KING GEORGE II’S ARMY WERE FAR SUPERIOR (HEAVIER AND BETTER QUALITY) THAN THOSE OF THE PRINCE AND HE WAS DEFEATED AT THE BATTLE OF CULLODEN IN APRIL OF 1745. NOT ONLY WAS HIS ARMY DEFEATED BUT THE SURVIVORS WERE CHASED DOWN AND BUTCHERED BY KING GEORGE II’S ARMY. PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD MANAGED TO ESCAPE DISGUISED AS AN ELDERLY WOMAN AND HIDE IN  SCOTLAND. ALTHOUGH SLIGHTLY WOUNDED FROM THE BATTLE, WHILE RECOVERING HE MET AND MARRIED CLEMENTINA COUNTESS OF WALKINSHAW AND THE 2 LATER WERE ABLE TO FLEE BACK TO FRANCE, WHERE THEY HAD A DAUGHTER, CHARLOTTE STUART. DUE TO THE DEFEAT IN ENGLAND CHARLES BECAME AN MUCH MORE OF AN ALCOHOLIC THE HE ALREADY WAS...

 

IN 1759 THE FRENCH HAD PLANS TO INVADE ENGLAND WITH FORCES OF MORE THAN 100,000 MEN AS PART OF THE SEVEN YEAR WAR IN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA. THE FRENCH AND INDIAN WAR WAS RAGING IN AMERICA FOR LAND RIGHTS TO VARIOUS TERRITORIES AND WITH THE PORTUGUESE FIGHTING WITH THE BRITISH AGAINST THE FRENCH AND SPANISH IN EUROPE. THE PRUSSIAN ARMY INVADED SAXONY LEAVING THE GERMAN RULERS OF BRITAIN STRUGGLING TO HOLD ON.

 

THE FRENCH CALLED IN PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD AS HIS FATHER’S PRINCE REGENT TO LEAD AN INVASION OF LONDON AND DESTROY THE GERMAN RULERS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF BRITAIN. HOWEVER THE 39 YEAR OLD ALCOHOLIC SHOWED UP DRUNK AND INCOHERENT AND THE PLAN TO INVADE ENGLAND AND PLACE PRINCE JAMES FRANCIS AS KING JAMES III & VIII WITH PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD AS HEIR APPARENT AND PRINCE OF WALES WAS FOREVER ABANDONED. IF THIS PLAN HAD GONE THROUGH AND EVERYONE BORN EXACTLY AS THEY HAVE BEEN I WOULD BE KING AND SOVEREIGN OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN, NOT QUEEN ELIZABETH II NOR HER PIG SON PRINCE CHARLES WINDSOR!

 

AFTER YEARS OF ABUSE AND ALCOHOLISM CLEMENTINA LEFT HER HUSBAND AND TOOK THEIR TEENAGE DAUGHTER CHARLOTTE STUART. THEY SOUGHT HELP FROM PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD’S BROTHER, PRINCE CARDINAL HENRY BENEDICT. THE CARDINAL WANTED CLEMENTINA TO SIGN THAT SHE WAS NEVER MARRIED TO PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD, WHICH WOULD MAKE CHARLOTTE ILLEGITIMATE, HER MOTHER REFUSED AND HE SENT THEM AWAY WITHOUT HELP OF ANY KIND. IN THE MEANTIME THE CARDINAL HAD BEEN LOOKING FOR A NEW WIFE FOR HIS BROTHER SO THAT HE COULD GIVE BIRTH TO A SON AND HEIR TO THE EXILED STUART THRONE. THE CARDINAL FOUND A VERY MUCH YOUNGER POLISH PRINCESS FOR HIS BROTHER TO MARRY, SO THE CARDINAL RECORDED THE FIRST MARRIAGE AS AN ANNULMENT BY THE CATHOLIC CHURCH, A TOTAL FALSEHOOD MADE BY THE CARDINAL ON BEHALF OF HIS BROTHER. SO NOW CHARLOTTE WAS BROKE AND SUDDENLY ILLEGITIMATE. THEY WENT TO THE HOME OF THE ROHAN FAMILY; PRINCE JULES HERCULE WAS NOW DUKE OF ROHAN AND ROHAN.

 

THE ROHAN FAMILY WERE PRINCELY FAMILIES SPREAD ACROSS EUROPE THEY HAD 5 BRANCHES AND 5 MAGNIFICENT PALACES ALONG THE FRANCE AND GERMAN BORDER, STRATEGICALLY PLACED TO PREVENT INVASION. A PALACE IN VIENNA, AUSTRIA, ONE IN PRAGUE, YUGOSLAVIA, A CASTLE IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND ANOTHER PALACE IN PARIS NOW THE HOTEL DE ROHAN – SOUBISE. THE ORIGINAL CASTLE IN JOSSELIN IN BRITTANY, FRANCE WAS THE FIRST HOME OF THE ROHAN FAMILIES. AS FOREIGN PRINCELY FAMILIES EACH LINE WAS UNDER THE CONTROL OF A DUC (DUKE) AND EVERY 1ST GENERATION MEMBER OF THE FAMILY HELD THE TITLE OF HSH (HIS OR HER SERENE HIGHNESS), THE PRINCE OR PRINCESS.

 

THE FEW OFFICIAL SOURCES (ALL ENGLISH COINCIDENTALLY) SAY THAT CHARLOTTE STUART BECAME THE MISTRESS OF PRINCE JULES’ YOUNGER BROTHER, PRINCE FERDINAND CARDINAL ROHAN, INTERESTINGLY ENOUGH A CATHOLIC CARDINAL HIMSELF AND THAT THEY HAD 3 CHILDREN, BUT ACCORDING TO ALL THE FRENCH RECORDS AND THERE ARE MANY, PRINCE CARDINAL FERDINAND WAS THE FATHER OF CHARLOTTE'S 2 OLDER DAUGHTERS BUT PRINCE JULES HERCULE ROHAN IS THE FATHER OF CHARLES EDWARD ROHAN , HIS NAME APPEARS ON THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF CHARLES EDWARD ROHAN AND THERE IS OF COURSE A MARRIAGE LICENSE FOR THE WIDOWED PRINCE JULES AND CHARLOTTE STUART.

 

FITTINGLY CORRECT I THINK SINCE PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD HAD SEDUCED AND MADE PREGNANT PRINCE JULES YOUNG WIFE MANY YEARS EARLIER. AT THIS TIME PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD WAS LIVING IN ROME WITH HIS BROTHER CARDINAL HENRY BENEDICT AND THE ROHANS, CHARLOTTE STUART AND HER MOTHER CLEMENTINA WALKINSHAW WERE LIVING IN ROHAN PALACE WITH THE DUKE OF ROHAN AND ROHAN, PRINCE JULES HERCULE. SO PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD HAD NO KNOWLEDGE THAT HIS ONLY DAUGHTER HAD 3 CHILDREN OF HER OWN.

 

ACCORDING TO THE COMPLETE BOOK OF PEERAGE, THIS BOOK IS CONSIDERED THE ‘OFFICIAL’ SOURCE FOR INFORMATION OF ROYAL AND NOBEL FAMILIES IN GREAT BRITAIN. THESE ARE THE ROHAN CHILDREN AND THIS IS WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM. I FIRST TELL YOU WHAT PEERAGE SAYS HAPPENED AND WHAT WE NOW TO BE TRUE. THE ELDEST WAS MARIE STUART BORN ‘ILLEGITIMATELY’ IN 1782 WHO DIED VERY YOUNG, YET RIGHT BELOW IT IS A PAINTING OF HER AS A YOUNG ADULT PAINTED BY HUGH DOUGLAS HAMILTON TITLED MARIE VICTOIRE deROHAN (HER REAL NAME). SHE WAS BORN 1779 AND SHE MET AND MARRIED INTO THE NOBEL POLISH FAMILY OF PININSKI AS AN ADULT, SHE HAD AT LEAST 4 CHILDREN. SHE LIVED UNTIL 1836 AND IS BURIED AT PININSKI CASTLE IN POLAND. NEXT LISTED IS THE 2ND ELDEST, ANOTHER DAUGHTER NAMED ALGAE STUART BORN ‘ILLEGITIMATELY’ BETWEEN 1880 AND 1881 SHE DIED YOUNG, HER REAL NAME WAS CHARLOTTE AMELIA deROHAN BORN IN 1880 AND DIED IN 1808, SHE DIED IN SWITZERLAND DURING ONE OF THE MANY PLAGUES GOING AROUND EUROPE AT THE AGE OF 28 WITHOUT BEING MARRIED AND WITHOUT ISSUE.

 

 

LASTLY WE HAVE CHARLES EDWARD STUART (ROHAN), WHICH IS NAME HE OFTEN USED AS AN ADULT FOR PROFESSIONAL REASONS, PEERAGE SAY HE WAS BORN ‘ILLEGITIMATELY’ IN 1784 AND WAS MARRIED TWICE, DYING IN 1854 IN A CARRIAGE ACCIDENT IN SCOTLAND AT THE AGE OF 70 DYING WITHOUT ISSUE (CHILDREN).

 

MOST OF THAT IS TRUE, BUT HIS REAL NAME WAS CHARLES EDWARD deROHAN deGUEMENEE AS HIS FATHER’S HEIR AS DUKE OF ROHAN AND ROHAN AND PRINCE OF ROHAN-GUEMENEE. PEERAGE ALSO SAYS HE STYLED HIMSELF COUNT ROEHANSTART FOR ROHAN-STUART, BUT FRENCH IMPERIAL RECORDS SHOW THAT NAPOLEON MADE HIM COUNT ROEHANSTART FOR HIS SERVICE AS A GENERAL IN THE NAPOLEONIC WARS. IN 1826 HE MARRIED LOUISA CONSTANCE SMITH OF LONDON AND TOOK HER TO AMERICA TO VISIT HER MANY RELATIVES THERE, AS PART OF THEIR HONEYMOON.

 

 DURING THEIR VISIT AND 9 MONTHS TO THE DAY LOUISA GAVE BIRTH TO A DAUGHTER IN GEORGIA, HER BAPTISMAL RECORD LISTS THE DATE OF BIRTH AS MARCH 19, 1827 TO THE COMTE ET COMTESSA d’ROEHANSTART, FRENCH FOR COUNT AND COUNTESS OF ROEHANSTART. FOR WHATEVER REASON LOUISA NEVER APPEARS ANYWHERE IN HISTORY AGAIN, PERHAPS SHE DIED WITHIN A FEW DAYS OF THE BIRTH, IT IS TRUTHFULLY KNOWN THAT COUNT ROEHANSTART RETURNED TO EUROPE ALONE LEAVING HIS DAUGHTER IN AMERICA WITH SMITH FAMILY RELATIVES, HE WOULD VISIT 2 MORE TIMES BEFORE DYING IN A CARRIAGE ACCIDENT IN SCOTLAND WHERE HE WAS BURIED ALONE. PEERAGE SAYS THAT THIS WAS THE END OF THE STUART LINE, BUT OBVIOUSLY IF HE HAD A DAUGHTER IT WOULD NOT NECESSARILY HAVE ENDED WITH COUNT ROEHANSTART IN 1854.

 

BACK IN 1753 CHARLOTTE STUART WAS BORN TO HER FATHER, PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD AND HIS FIRST WIFE, CLEMENTINA WALKINSHAW, WHO WAS COUNTESS OF ALBERSTROF BY INHERITANCE. THE COUPLE HAD THE CHILD BAPTIZED BY CATHOLIC RIGHTS WHICH WOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED IF SHE WAS BORN ILLEGITIMATE AS MOST ENGLISH HISTORY BOOKS CLAIM SHE WAS.

 

 

IN 1783 CHARLOTTE RETURN TO HER FATHER’S SIDE LEAVING HER 3 CHILDREN IN HER MOTHERS CARE WHO MOVED THEM TO SWITZERLAND. CHARLOTTE  TOLD HER FATHER ABOUT HER 3 CHILDREN, BUT CARDINAL HENRY WHO HAD KNOWN ABOUT THE CHILDREN FOR MANY YEARS CONVINCED HIS BROTHER THAT SHE WAS LYING TO HIM. CHARLOTTE AND HER FATHER RECONCILED AND HE SIGNED AN ACT OF LEGITIMIZATION IN ITALY WHICH LEGALLY OVERTURNED HIS BROTHER'S ANNULMENT PROCEEDINGS AND TITLED HER HRH DUCHESS OF ALBANY, HIS ONLY REAL TITLE, HE NAMED HER HIS SOLE HEIR AND ALSO HAD THIS ACT SENT TO KING LOUIS XVI WHERE IT WAS RECORDED IN THE PARLIAMENT OF PARIS.

 

PRINCE CHARLES EDWARD DIED IN ROME IN 1788; HIS DAUGHTER AND SOLE HEIR DIED A YEAR LATER IN 1789 OF CONSUMPTION. CARDINAL HENRY BENEDICT DIED IN 1807. 200 YEARS LATER THE JACOBITE FOLLOWERS ERRONEOUSLY DECIDED THAT CARDINAL HENRY WAS HIS BROTHER'S HEIR. IN HIS WILL CARDINAL HENRY GIVE ALL HIS RIGHTS TO 'HIS COUSIN', THE TERM HE ACTUALLY USED, WHICH THE JACOBITES FALSELY BELIEVE HE MEANT HIS DISTANT SECOND COUSIN IN ITALY KING CHARLES EMMANUEL IV OF SARDINIA. CARDINAL HENRY WAS NOT THE LEGAL HEIR TO HIS BROTHER’S RIGHTS, CHARLOTTE STUART WAS, SO CHARLOTTE’S CHILDREN WOULD BE HER HEIRS, MORE SPECIFICALLY COUNT ROEHANSTART, AND NOT CARDINAL HENRY BENEDICT.

 

IN HIS WILL THE CARDINAL DOES NOT NAME HIS HEIR, BUT SAYS TO THAT COUSIN WHO BY RIGHT IS ENTITLED TO ALL MY RIGHT’S AND CLAIMS, IN THIS CASE CHARLES EDWARD deROHAN, HIS NIECE'S ONLY SON.

 

IN ANYTHING AND EVERYTHING YOU READ ON THE INTERNET, IT ALWAYS SAYS THAT CHARLOTTE WAS ILLEGITIMATE AS WAS HER SON AND HEIR CHARLES EDWARD THE COUNT deROEHANSTART

 

CAROLINE ADELAIDE deROHAN WAS BORN IN AMERICA, THE LEGAL, LEGITIMATE AND ONLY HEIR TO THE STUART THRONE OF GREAT BRITAIN. SHE WAS ALSO THE SOLE HEIR TO THE ROHAN FAMILY AS PRINCESS OF ROHAN-GUEMENEE, WHICH HAD BEEN DISSOLVED BY THE FRENCH REVOLUTION IN 1796 WHEN NAPOLEON CAME TO POWER. SHE HELD THE TITLES OF DUCHESS OF ALBANY, COUNTESS OF ROEHANSTART AND HEREDITARY PRINCE OF ROHAN-GUEMENEE, EXCEPT THAT SHE WAS BORN AND RAISED IN AMERICA.

 

THE PRINCESS CAROLINE MARRIED JOSHUA LAYTON OF SPARTANBURG, SOUTH CAROLINA, THEY HAD 3 SONS THAT WERE OLD ENOUGH TO FIGHT IN THE CIVIL WAR AND ALL 3 DIED DURING THE WAR, SADLY WITHOUT ISSUE, BUT CAROLINE AND JOSHUA HAD MORE CHILDREN, THE OLDEST MALE TO SURVIVE TO ADULT HOOD BEING ALFRED JOSHUA LAYTON BORN IN 1851 BEFORE THE CIVIL WAR AND WHO WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN THE REQUIRED 16 YEARS OF AGE TO SERVE UNTIL AFTER END OF THE CIVIL WAR.

 

RIGHT AFTER THE CIVIL WAR THE FAMILY MOVED FROM SPARTANBURG, SC, TO ATLANTA GEORGIA, WHERE THEY PURCHASED A LARGE FARM. ALFRED MARRIED LAURA HARRIS IN 1875 AND THEY HAD 3 CHILDREN, 2 GIRLS AND 1 BOY NAMED MADISON WALLACE LAYTON. LAURA HARRIS DESCENDS FROM A VERY LONG LINE OF NOBLES FROM ENGLAND,

 

THIS SAME  BRANCH OF THE HARRIS FAMILY WAS PART OF THE JAMESTOWN SETTLEMENT OF VIRGINIA. THERE IS A SOCIETY OF THE ORDER OF FIRST FAMILIES OF VIRGINIA WITH HARRIS LISTED AS PART OF CLAIBORNE, GURGANEY FAMILIES WHICH ALL CAME FROM THE SAME AREA OF ENGLAND AND WERE RECRUITED BY THE VIRGINIA COMPANY TO COME TO AMERICA TO ESTABLISH A COLONY. I AM A DIRECT DESCENDANT OF SEVERAL OF THESE FAMILIES AND A MAJORITY OF THE ROYAL AND NOBEL FAMILIES ALL THE WAY BACK TO WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR. DIRECT DESCENT IS BY A FATHER OR MOTHER OR GRANDFATHER, GRANDMOTHER AND ALL GENERATIONS OF GREAT GRANDFATHERS AND GREAT GRANDMOTHERS.

 

 NAMES ON THE VIRGINIA LIST THAT I AM RELATED TO INCLUDE BASSETT AND HOLLAND ON MY MOTHER’S SIDE. BOLLING, CHURCHILL, CLAIBORNE, PERCY AND SPENCER (YES PRINCESS DIANA’S FAMILY) ON MY FATHER’S SIDE. HARRISON IS ALSO FROM THE 13TH CENTURY BARON ROBERT II de HOLLAND (MY MOTHER’S SIDE) AND IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO PRESIDENTS WILLIAM HARRISON AND BENJAMIN HARRISON JAMES MADISON, THOMAS JEFFERSON, GEORGE WASHINGTON (A WASHINGTON ANCESTOR APPEARS ON THE LIST AS WELL) AND U.S. GRANT.

 

IN THE LIST OF FIRST FAMILIES OF MARYLAND ONE NAME IS ALSO PROMINENT, THAT OF HOWARD THE FAMILY OF THE DUKE OF NORFOLK FROM WHICH QUEEN ANNE BOLEYN AND QUEEN CATHERINE HOWARD BOTH WIVES OF KING HENRY VIII CAME FROM, COINCIDENTALLY THESE WERE THE 2 WIVES WHOSE HEADS HE CHOPPED OFF.

 

MADISON WALLACE LAYTON WAS BORN IN ATLANTA IN 1879. I HAVE SINCE NAMED HIM MADISON THE FIRST (I) SINCE HE NAMED HIS ONLY SON MADISON WALLACE LAYTON, WHOM I HAVE NAMED THE SECOND (II). MADISON I, MARRIED CLAUDIA JONES OF ATLANTA AND THEY HAD 2 CHILDREN 1 BOY AND 1 GIRL. MADISON WALLACE LAYTON II WAS BORN IN 1913 AND WOULD BE THE LAST LAYTON BORN ON THE LAYTON FAMILY FARM, THE ELDER MADISON GOT DRUNK ONE NIGHT IN 1925 AND THE HOUSE BURNED DOWN KILLING HIM IN IT, CLAUDIA AND HER CHILDREN MOVED TO A SMALL HOUSE IN THE CENTER OF ATLANTA AND SHE LATER REMARRIED A MAN NAMED HUNNICUTT.

 

IN 1931 MADISON WALLACE LAYTON II AT THE AGE OF 18 MOVED FROM ATLANTA TO LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA WHERE HE MET AND MARRIED GLADYS LAVELLE GUTHRIE, GLADYS WAS THE DAUGHTER OF BEULAH MAE MCGEE AND WAS A DIRECT DESCENDANT GOING ALL THE WAY BACK TO WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR. ROYAL DAUGHTERS OF THE PLANTAGENETS LINED UP TO MARRY McGHEE MEN. THESE McGHEE MEN MUST HAVE BEEN BEAUTIFUL MEN, TALL, GOOD LOOKING AND POWERFULLY BUILT.

 

MY PATERNAL GREAT GRANDMOTHER COMES FROM THE MALE McGHEE LINE, A LINE WHICH INCLUDES THE HOWARD LINE MENTIONED 3 PARAGRAPHS ABOVE, THIS McGHEE GREAT GRANDMOTHER'S MOTHER WAS A STAFFORD THAT HOLDS 2 DIRECT BUT SEPARATE LINES OF STAFFORD FROM THE DUKES OF BUCKINGHAM; THE 1ST DUKE WAS A DIRECT DESCENDANT OF KING EDWARD III.

 

A FEW YEARS AGO I HAD MY DNA REPORT UPDATED AND SHOWS OVER 1800 DIRECT BUT  SEPARATE HITS FOR CHARLEMAGNE. THE DNA LAB SAYS THEY SIMPLY STOPPED COUNTING AT 1800 AND STATED THAT THERE ARE MANY MORE. MY MOTHERS LINE HAS 38 OF THOSE CHARLEMAGNE DNA HITS BUT MY FATHER’S LINES REPRESENT ALL THE REST!! DOING GENEALOGY RESEARCH ON MY HOME COMPUTER I HAVE FOUND ABOUT 700 OF THOSE CHARLEMAGNE LINES BUT IT IS STAGGERING TO THINK ABOUT OVER 1800 HITS!

 

"QUEEN ELIZABETH II" HAS ONLY 80 LINES FOR CHARLEMAGNE ON BASED PROVABLE GENEALOGY; HER 80 LINES VERSUS MY 1800 HITS?

 I HAVE 26 HITS TO KING HENRY VII AS MY 15TH GREAT GRANDFATHER. SHE HAS 2, SHE HAS ONE LINKING HER TO WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR WHILE I HAVE 56 CONNECTIONS TO WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR. SO AS THE DESCENDANT OF THE DAUGHTER OF KING JAMES I AND VI VERSUS MY BEING THE DESCENDANT OF THE SON OF KING JAMES I AND VI AND NOW THE PROOF THAT SHE HAS ONLY ONE BLOOD CONNECTION TO WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR MEANS SHE IS DISPLACED NOT ONCE BUT TWICE.

 

MY GRANDFATHER, MADISON WALLACE LAYTON II  "DUB"; HE TOLD ME WHEN I WAS 8 OR 9 YEARS OLD THAT HIS FATHER HAD TOLD HIM HE WAS THE GREAT GRANDSON OF A KING AND DUBBED HIM A PRINCE WHEN HE WAS 10 YEARS OLD AND ALWAYS WENT BY THE NICKNAME 'DUB' I CALLED HIM GRANDPA DUB! HIS PICTURE IS NEAR THE TOP OF THIS PAGE, MY GRANDFATHER AND GLADYS GUTHRIE HAD TWIN FRATERNAL SONS IN APRIL 1939, THE FIRST BORN WAS MY FATHER MICHAEL RUSSELL LAYTON FOLLOWED BY STEPHEN DOUGLAS LAYTON BORN 7 HOURS LATER.

 

MY FATHER AND MOTHER WERE MARRIED IN TIJUANA MEXICO AND MY OLDER BROTHER WAS BORN IN DEC. 1958 AFTER THE BIRTH MY FATHER WHO WAS IN THE AIR FORCE AND LIVING WITH MY MOTHER WERE REQUIRED TO MARRY LEGALLY HERE IN THE U.S. MY FATHER MANY YEARS LATER TOLD ME HE NEVER BELIEVED THAT MY OLDER BROTHER WAS HIS SON AS HE HAS BLOND HAIR AND A DIFFERENT BLOOD TYPE THAN I DO. THE BLOOD TYPE WAS PROVEN TO BE FROM MY MOTHER BUT NOT MY FATHER!

 

BOTH MY PARENTS HAD DARK HAIR AS DID THEIR PARENTS...HMM? ON JANUARY 12, 1960 I WAS BORN. 2 YEARS LATER MY MOTHER GOT PREGNANT AGAIN WITH MY SISTER DEBBIE,  AND WHEN BOTH MY SISTER AND I WERE BORN WITH REDDISH BROWN HAIR AND BLUE GREEN EYES, (BOTH STUART FAMILY TRAITS) MY FATHER TOLD MY MOTHER, SEE I TOLD YOU HE IS NOT MY SON! AND HE SENT THE FAMILY BACK TO LIVE WITH HIS PARENTS AND HE WENT HIS OWN WAY AND HAD 2 CHILDREN WITH JANET DEARDORF 6 YEARS AFTER I WAS BORN MY PARENTS DIVORCED IN MARCH 1966. SO FROM 5 CHILDREN THAT MY FATHER HAD, ONLY 2 CAN BE PROVEN AS HIS LEGITIMATE CHILDREN AND INCLUDED IN THE ROYAL LINE OF KING JAMES II AND VII; ME AND MY SISTER THE PRINCESS  DEBBIE.

 

I STAYED SINGLE FOR MANY YEARS EVEN THOUGH I HAD GIRLFRIENDS IN HIGH SCHOOL I HAD JOINED THE US ARMY TO EARN MONEY FOR A COLLEGE EDUCATION BUT ENDED UP BECOMING AN OFFICER AND STAYING FOR MANY YEARS, I WAS MARRIED AT 32 TO A GORGEOUS MEXICAN WHO WAS DESCENDED DIRECTLY FROM THE SPANISH ROYAL FAMILY. BUT SHE WAS KILLED IN A CAR ACCIDENT WHILE PREGNANT AND THE BABY DIED AS WELL. IN 1998 AT AGE 38, I MET AND MARRIED GLADYS DAVILA OF MANHATTAN, NEW YORK CITY; IN SEPTEMBER OF 2000 WE HAD PRINCESS PAULINE AMANDA AND IN NOVEMBER 2004 PRINCE JACOB JEREMY WAS BORN.

 

THIS IS THE ROYAL FAMILY OF KING JAMES II AND VII AS IT EXISTS TODAY. WE USE THE TITLE OF HSH, PRINCES AND PRINCESSES OF ROHAN-GUEMENEE THIS IS THE FRENCH FAMILY NAME FROM ABOVE AND THE ONLY ONE WE HAVE A RIGHT TO LEGALLY USE TODAY, HOPEFULLY ONE DAY GREAT BRITAIN WILL ACKNOWLEDGE OUR EXISTENCE AND RESTORE THOSE TITLES AS WELL.(CURRENTLY THE LAWS IN BRITAIN TO THIS DAY STATE THAT ALL MEMBERS OF A MALE LINE DESCENDING DIRECTLY FROM THE MONARCH ARE ALLOWED THE USE OF H.R.H. OR HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS)

 

 

CHILDREN OF HSH  MICHAEL LAYTON (DECEASED)

& HSH CAROL ANN, DUCHESS OF ROHAN & ROHAN (DECEASED)

1) HSH, PRINCE JOHN ROBERT, TITULAR KING

2) HSH PRINCE JACOB JEREMY, HEIR-GENERAL

3) HSH PRINCESS PAULINE AMANDA, TITULAR PRINCESS ROYAL

             

MY COUSINS, THE DAUGHTERS OF

HSH, STEPHEN LAYTON (DECEASED)

6) HSH, PRINCESS KIMBERLY SUE

7) HSH, PRINCESS KRISTEN JANE

8) HSH, PRINCESS TINA LOUISE

 

MY FATHER'S COUSIN

THE LADY LAURA FERNANDEZ

 

MY AUNT ON MY MOTHER'S SIDE

THE LADY KELLY BOYER (DAUGHTER OF SIR JOHN DUNN, GRAND CHEVALIER OF SENLIS) (KILLED IN ACTION IN WWII) AWARDED POSTHUMOUSLY

 

ON FACEBOOK

ON TWITTER

ON LINKEDIN